Skip to main content

CJCJ in the news: U.S. Supreme Court, Life Sentences for Juveniles Must Be Reviewed

U.S. Supreme Court: Life Sentences for Juveniles Must Be Reviewed

Public News Service interviews CJCJ's executive director, Daniel Macallair, on the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent juvenile justice decision. 

In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled,  in Miller v. Alabama, that mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole for people who commited crimes as juveniles was unconstitutional. On Monday, January 25, 2016, the Court decided to make its 2012 ruling retroactive — meaning people sentenced to life without parole can now apply for parole or resentencing. 

"The rest of the world, through the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Children, has said sentencing children for an act committed at 15, 16, or 17, to serve the rest of their life in prison - it's an inhumane sentence," said Daniel Macallair, director of the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice in San Francisco. "Civilized countries don't do it, and we shouldn't do it." — Daniel Macallair

 

Listen to the full story: 

Keywords: Daniel Macallair, JLWOP, Juvenile justice, Miller v. Alabama, parole, sentencing, Supreme Court

Posted in Juvenile Justice, Sentencing

Contribute to CJCJ

Make a difference to youth and adults trying to get their lives back on track.


California Stentencing Institute screenshot

California Sentencing
Institute (CASI)

Explore how California’s 58 counties send their residents to correctional institutions with interactive maps, charts, and downloadable data.

Connect with us

      YouTube

Contribute to CJCJ

Make a difference to youth and adults trying to get their lives back on track.

Join our mailing list

Get regular updates and news delivered to your inbox. We won’t share your information with anyone else.