Overview Cameo House & Women's Services Community Options for Youth (COY) Detention Diversion Advocacy Program (DDAP) Expert Sentencing Support Services Juvenile Collaborative Reentry Unit (JCRU) No Violence Alliance (NoVA) Technical Assistance Overview Campaign to Reinvest in Higher Education Next Generation Fellowship Legislation Transparency & Accountability California Sentencing Institute

A National Record of Justice Reform

CJCJ’s national experience in justice reform offers unique insight into the challenges facing state and local systems. Across the country, these challenges share a common cause: decades of correctional policies that relied too heavily on incarceration to solve social problems. 

Through innovative programs and reform leadership, CJCJ promotes a more humane and effective approach to justice — one that prioritizes opportunity, accountability, and community-based solutions over punishment.

How We Got Here & How We Move Forward

The justice systems we have today were not inevitable. They were built — through policy choices, political pressures, and institutional inertia — over decades. And because they were built, they can be rebuilt. CJCJ’s work is grounded in this conviction: that safety and compassion are not opposing values, and that the most durable reforms come from communities, not from institutions acting alone.

Across California, San Francisco, Hawaiʻi, and Washington D.C., CJCJ has demonstrated that reducing incarceration — through research, direct service, legislative advocacy, and coalition building — produces better outcomes for youth, families, and public safety. The pages in this series tell that story.

CJCJ’s Role Across Jurisdictions

Massachusetts — The founding inspiration: Dr. Jerome G. Miller closes every youth prison and establishes CJCJ to carry the mission to California
Hawaiʻi
— CJCJ’s independent assessment and Youth Advocacy Project pioneers the intensive case management model, earning a Leadership Award from the Office of Youth Services
Washington D.C.
 — CJCJ’s DDAP and Independent Living Program help transform the D.C. youth detention system under the Jerry M. consent decree
San Francisco
 — CJCJ builds DDAP into a national model, helps create the Children’s Fund, and leads advocacy for juvenile hall closure
California
 — 35 years of legislative testimony, investigative reporting, and coalition-building culminate in the permanent closure of the Division of Juvenile Justice in 2023

Explore CJCJ’s Record of Reform

Each section of this presentation tells a distinct chapter in CJCJ’s history — from the Massachusetts experiment that gave birth to the organization, to the local work in San Francisco, to the national precedent set by California’s closure of its youth prison system.

Core Principles — What We’ve Learned

CJCJ’s four decades of reform work across jurisdictions and decades has produced a consistent set of lessons about what reform requires — and what makes it last.

  • Incarceration is not a solution to social problems
    Decades of evidence show that communities investing in prevention, education, and support produce better safety outcomes than those relying on confinement.
  • Community-based solutions work at scale
    From San Francisco’s DDAP to California’s realignment, the evidence is consistent: community care is safer, more humane, and more effective than institutional confinement.
  • Data and advocacy must work together
    Rigorous research without advocacy stalls in journals. Advocacy without research lacks the credibility to shift policy. CJCJ’s model combines both in every campaign.
  • Reform means closing institutions — not improving them
    Improving conditions preserves institutions and guarantees abuses return. Dr. Miller proved this in Massachusetts. CJCJ built its entire mission on the insight.
  • Sustained advocacy produces structural change
    California’s closure of DJJ took 35 years. CJCJ’s long-term commitment — research, testimony, coalition-building, and independent monitoring — transformed short-term reform into structural abolition.
  • Safety and compassion go hand in hand
    Systems that reduce imprisonment and center community produce stronger, safer communities. The false choice between justice and mercy is the first myth that reform must dismantle.