Overview Cameo House & Women's Services Community Options for Youth (COY) Detention Diversion Advocacy Program (DDAP) Sentencing Planning and Support Services Juvenile Collaborative Reentry Unit (JCRU) No Violence Alliance (NoVA) Technical Assistance Overview California Sentencing Institute Next Generation Fellowship Legislation Transparency & Accountability

KCBS reports on the proposed Oakland youth curfew which is being considered tonight by the Board of Supervisors.

Articles on veterans, juvenile diversion program volunteers, court-ordered mentoring for adjudicated youth, pretrial publicity, and punishing racial and ethnic minority student athletes.

This is the final blog of a three part series examining for profit youth facilities.

This is the second installment of a blog series examining private for profit youth prisons.

The San Francisco Bay Guardian article highlights CJCJ’s Cameo House program and importance of alternatives to incarceration and individualized care. 

CJCJ’s Supportive Living Program closes its doors and policy staff report on the ineffectiveness of curfews.

After 22 years of guiding men to and through their roads of recovery, CJCJ’s Supportive Living Program (SLP) is closing its doors today. We are saddened by its passing but take pride in its accomplishments.

In this three-part series Senior Research Fellow Randall Shelden examines for-profit youth prisons.

Patsy Jackson has been a case manager with NoVA for two years. Patsy helps her clients succeed by minimizing barriers to reentry and facilitating reintegration in their families and communities.

Unofficial notes from the meeting, taken by CJCJ’s Brian Goldstein.

There are many collateral consequences to criminal convictions in California, such as barriers to employment, housing, and social services. An additional concern that criminal defense attorneys should consider when advising their clients is the possible immigration consequences of their conviction.

The Partnership has been an instrumental lobby spending billions of dollars on decades of misdirected, billion-dollar drug free” ad campaigns that are really designed to protect powerful legal-drug interests and major constituencies. By using emotional images and misinformation to divert attention from real drug issues and prevent sensible solutions, the Partnership has functioned as a key promoter of drug abuse.